Explore
Flagship studies, sector briefs, and recurring reports, by topic.
Long-form data narratives that walk through an argument.
Recurring advisor series, from weekly reads to annual reviews.
The daily policy prescription, generated each morning.
Seven sector deep-dives: banking, trade, energy, agriculture, and more.
Ask the corpus: answers grounded in published work, with citations.
Grounding verified
Dhaka ~6,500 t/day; collection + landfill gap
Dhaka generates roughly 6,500 tonnes of waste per day, and the city runs a persistent collection and landfill gap (per the curated note). That gap is not an abstraction. Waste that is not collected ends up in canals, drains, roadside heaps, and open burning, which means each unaddressed tonne returns as urban flooding, public-health load, and air pollution. The structural nature of the problem matters now because the daily generation figure is large and recurring: every day the system clears less than it produces, the backlog and its downstream costs compound. There is no current quantified state value on record for the gap itself, which is itself a finding: the system is being managed without a measured baseline for how much waste is collected versus generated, and without a baseline you cannot set a target or hold anyone accountable. The lead responsible body is the Department of Environment (DoE), with the Forest Department as a supporting body.
Do the measurement first. Actions 1 and 5 are the unlock: until DoE can state, monthly, how many tonnes are collected against the roughly 6,500 tonnes per day generated, every other action is unverifiable. With a baseline in hand, the segregation circular (action 2) and the disposal-site standard (action 3) become enforceable because compliance can be checked against tonnage and inspection records. Performance-linked payment (action 4) comes last in the year because it depends on the weighbridge data from action 1 being trusted.
The binding constraint is institutional, not technical. DoE is the environmental regulator, but day-to-day collection sits with city authorities, so DoE's leverage runs through standards, permits, and circulars rather than direct operation, and enforcement can stall where coordination is weak. Fiscally, engineered disposal and weighbridge instrumentation carry upfront cost against a recurring operating budget, so the disposal-site standard must be phased to what the budget line can sustain. Politically, source segregation asks behavior change from millions of households, which fails without sustained, ward-level communication.
Dhaka's roughly 6,500 tonnes per day overwhelm a system with no measured collection-versus-landfill gap, so the first job is to make the gap a number DoE reports every month. Once measured, segregation, engineered disposal, and delivery-linked payment can be enforced against that number instead of against impressions.
The figures and responsible bodies cited in this prescription are drawn from the platform's own data and the GovTwin registry listed below.
Drafted by an Opus writer grounded in the facts above. Where the prescription cites a figure, it is drawn from those facts. The diagnosis derives from the BDPolicyLab crisis taxonomy; the responsible body and budget from the GovTwin registry. Recommended actions are the think tank's policy judgment.