Explore
Flagship studies, sector briefs, and recurring reports, by topic.
Long-form data narratives that walk through an argument.
Recurring advisor series, from weekly reads to annual reviews.
The daily policy prescription, generated each morning.
Seven sector deep-dives: banking, trade, energy, agriculture, and more.
Ask the corpus: answers grounded in published work, with citations.
Grounding verified
~73% married women report IPV per BBS VAW survey
Gender-based violence in Bangladesh is not an episodic shock, it is a structural condition of married life. The BBS Violence Against Women survey, cited in the curated note, finds that roughly 73% of married women report intimate partner violence (IPV). When nearly three in four ever-married women experience violence from a partner, this is not a fringe protection issue handled by a few shelters, it is a population-scale public health burden that flows through the same clinics, sub-district hospitals, and maternal care points the health system already runs every day.
That framing matters for ownership. The lead responsible body in the government registry is the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), with the Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE) as a supporting body. The health system is where survivors physically appear, often presenting with injury or maternal complications rather than disclosing violence. A response built inside DGHS, rather than left to ad hoc projects, is the only way to reach a problem at this scale. The current operational reality is that clinical first-line support, safe referral, and documentation are uneven and donor-project dependent, so the system sees the injuries but rarely captures the cause or routes the survivor to safety.
Issue the DGHS circular first (action 1): it is the legal anchor that names focal officers and makes the protocol standard of care, and nothing else is enforceable without it. In parallel, add the GBV field to existing reporting forms (action 2), because once the circular names the function, you immediately need to count it. With focal officers named and a register live, district one-stop care (action 3) and continuous training (action 5) have a structure to attach to. Securing the recurrent budget line (action 4) should be locked into the next budget cycle so the year-one circular does not lapse into another unfunded mandate.
The binding constraints are fiscal and institutional. A recurrent budget line competes with established health priorities, and GBV response is easily cut when revenue is tight. Health staff are already overstretched, so any new task without protected time and supervision will be quietly dropped. There is also a disclosure-and-safety risk: counting cases without confidentiality and a real referral destination can expose survivors rather than protect them, so the register and the referral pathway must come together, never the register alone.
When roughly 73% of married women report intimate partner violence, the health system is already the front line whether or not it is organised for it, so DGHS should convert that contact into protocol-driven, funded, survivor-centred care. The single highest-leverage first move is the DGHS circular that names a focal officer in every facility and makes first-line support standard of care, because it turns a population-scale problem from a project into a permanent function.
The figures and responsible bodies cited in this prescription are drawn from the platform's own data and the GovTwin registry listed below.
Drafted by an Opus writer grounded in the facts above. Where the prescription cites a figure, it is drawn from those facts. The diagnosis derives from the BDPolicyLab crisis taxonomy; the responsible body and budget from the GovTwin registry. Recommended actions are the think tank's policy judgment.