Explore
Flagship studies, sector briefs, and recurring reports, by topic.
Long-form data narratives that walk through an argument.
Recurring advisor series, from weekly reads to annual reviews.
The daily policy prescription, generated each morning.
Seven sector deep-dives: banking, trade, energy, agriculture, and more.
Ask the corpus: answers grounded in published work, with citations.
Grounding verified
Non-revenue water >25%; aquifer overdraw
Dhaka's piped water system loses more than a quarter of what it produces before any customer is billed. The curated assessment puts non-revenue water above 25 percent, water that is pumped, treated, and pressurized but never reaches a paying meter because of physical leaks, illegal connections, and unmetered or under-billed use. Every liter lost is a liter of energy, chemicals, and groundwater spent for no revenue and no service.
That waste matters now because the system leans heavily on groundwater, and the note flags aquifer overdraw: the water table is being drawn down faster than it recharges. Leakage and overdraw compound each other. The more the network loses, the more must be pumped to maintain pressure, and the more the aquifer is mined. A utility that loses over 25 percent of its output is effectively running extra wells to fill holes in its own pipes. Left unaddressed, this is not a billing nuisance, it is a slow-moving supply crisis: deeper wells, higher pumping costs, land subsidence risk, and a thinner buffer for dry seasons. The lead responsible body in the registry is the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MoPEMR), and the energy intensity of pumping that wasted water is precisely why the energy authority has standing here.
Start with measurement: stand up the water balance and the district-metered-area map. Without a defensible baseline, every later claim of savings is contestable and every budget request is unfunded. In parallel, meter pumping energy, because that link is what gives MoPEMR a clean mandate and a hard number to manage against. Once two or three worst-loss zones are metered, begin pressure management there. The baseline unlocks the target, the target unlocks the capital line, and the early-zone results unlock the case for scaling to the rest of the network.
The binding constraints are fiscal and political. Capital for metering and zone works competes with more visible projects, so the energy-saving framing is what keeps it fundable. Illegal connections have constituencies; regularization that adds meters is more durable than enforcement that adds grievances. Aquifer caps bite only if abstraction is actually monitored, and a registry that lists an energy ministry as lead for a water utility signals a coordination seam that must be closed by explicit directive, not left to assumption.
Dhaka loses over a quarter of its water before billing while drawing down its aquifer, and the two problems feed each other through the pump. Measure the loss, ring-fence the network into metered zones, and convert leakage cuts into verified energy and groundwater savings, in that order.
The figures and responsible bodies cited in this prescription are drawn from the platform's own data and the GovTwin registry listed below.
Drafted by an Opus writer grounded in the facts above. Where the prescription cites a figure, it is drawn from those facts. The diagnosis derives from the BDPolicyLab crisis taxonomy; the responsible body and budget from the GovTwin registry. Recommended actions are the think tank's policy judgment.