Explore
Flagship studies, sector briefs, and recurring reports, by topic.
Long-form data narratives that walk through an argument.
Recurring advisor series, from weekly reads to annual reviews.
The daily policy prescription, generated each morning.
Seven sector deep-dives: banking, trade, energy, agriculture, and more.
Ask the corpus: answers grounded in published work, with citations.
Grounding verified
~6 km/h peak speed; productivity + air-quality drag
Dhaka's peak traffic moves at roughly 6 km/h, about the pace of a brisk walk, according to the curated problem note. At that speed the city imposes two compounding costs the note flags directly: a productivity drag (hours of working time lost in vehicles each day) and an air-quality drag (idling engines concentrating tailpipe pollution over the densest part of the country). These are not separate problems. Congestion and combustion feed each other: slow-moving, stop-start traffic burns more fuel per kilometre, and more combustion-vehicle kilometres deepen both the jam and the smog.
This matters now because the binding lever is shifting. The lead responsible body in the entity registry is the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MoPEMR), and its mandate, electricity supply, the grid, and renewable energy, is exactly the input that an electrified mobility transition depends on. Decongestion will ultimately require transport-sector road and transit decisions, but the energy precondition (clean, reliable power delivered to where vehicles charge) has to be built first or the transition stalls. MoPEMR can move on that precondition immediately.
Start with action 1: the PGCB corridor capacity maps are the foundation, because no charging strategy, tariff, or clean-supply commitment is credible without knowing where the grid can carry the load. In parallel, BERC drafts the EV tariff (action 2), since pricing signals must exist before private operators invest. Once maps and tariffs are public, SREDA's clean-generation tie-ins (action 3) and the reliability guarantee (action 4) can be committed against real corridor data. The joint cell (action 5) should be convened early but produces its binding workplan once the energy-side facts are on the table. The first-year unlock is simple: a funded, mapped, transparently-priced charging backbone that lets the transport side plan electrified bus and vehicle fleets with confidence.
The binding fiscal constraint is generation and grid capital: charging load competes with existing demand, and overcommitting firm supply to mobility could strain the system. The binding institutional constraint is mandate overlap: congestion is fundamentally a transport problem, and an energy ministry leading it risks stranded effort unless the joint cell genuinely binds transport authorities in. The binding political constraint is tariff sensitivity: any new EV tariff category invites lobbying, and off-peak pricing only works if metering and enforcement hold. Without the transport side moving on road space and transit, electrification reduces emissions per kilometre but does not by itself raise the 6 km/h crawl.
Dhaka's 6 km/h gridlock is both a productivity and an air-quality crisis, and the precondition for fixing it, clean reliable power delivered to where vehicles charge, sits squarely inside MoPEMR's mandate. Build the grid-ready, transparently-priced, renewably-powered charging backbone first, then bind the transport authorities to it, so electrification cuts emissions while the wider decongestion plan catches up.
The figures and responsible bodies cited in this prescription are drawn from the platform's own data and the GovTwin registry listed below.
Drafted by an Opus writer grounded in the facts above. Where the prescription cites a figure, it is drawn from those facts. The diagnosis derives from the BDPolicyLab crisis taxonomy; the responsible body and budget from the GovTwin registry. Recommended actions are the think tank's policy judgment.